Wednesday, October 31, 2012

Charter Schools



      The idea of charter schools has been a controversial topic since it originated in 1988.  Mr. Ray Budde established charter schools in an attempt to reform public schools.  The NJ Department of Education states the charter school law was passed to give parents a choice for their children's education and intended to:  improve student learning and achievement, increase the availability of choice to parents and students when selecting a learning environment, encourage the use of different and innovative learning methods, establish a new system of accountability for schools, make the school the unit for educational improvement, and establish new professional opportunities for teachers.  In 1991, Minnesota was the first state to pass a charter school law and in 1992, California followed.  Katherine Merseth states, in her book entitled Inside Urban Charter Schools, "Charter schools are similar to traditional public schools in several ways: they receive government funds to operate, they may not engage in religious instruction, and they are open to all interested students."  

While charter schools have similarities to the traditional public schools, they also have differences.  For example, a group of private individuals may open and govern a charter school, the leaders of these organizations may have little or no formal training in education, many charter school founders are nonprofit entrepreneurs and these are schools of choice.  Charter schools are primary or secondary schools founded by nonprofit groups, universities, government entities, teachers, parents, or activist who feel restricted by the traditional public school setting.  These schools are authorized to function once they have received a charter, a statutorily defined performance contract outlining and stating the schools vision, mission, goals, program, methods of assessments and methods to measure success.  These schools make up their own rules and regulations, are not governed by the statutes that apply to other public schools, and are also considered nonprofit entities. Students attending charter schools are there by choice and are not subject to pay tuition.  Although their enrollment is based on a lottery-based system, the lottery is said to be open to all students.  In 2008, it was reported by the survey of US charter schools, that 59% of charter schools had a waiting list averaging 198 students.  
There are many pros and cons to charter schools.
Pros
Cons
Provide families with public school choice options giving parents the ability to choose the school best suited for their child
Small in size and have limited numbers so they can only provide some families with public school choice options, raising issues of fairness and equity
Can act as laboratories of reform identifying successful practices that could be replicated by traditional district public schools
Successful reform models such as New American Schools and Core Knowledge have already been identified.  Why not attempt these reforms in existing schools?  If rules and regulations are so burdensome, they should be waived for all public schools.
Competition within the school system is created, pressuring districts to reassess their educational practices
Have an unfair advantage when competing against district public schools since they tend to be smaller and free from regulations
Will lead to overall systemic reform through the pressure and competition of the choice mechanism
Too limited in scope to adequately pressure the entire public school system
Unlike traditional public schools are held accountable; if they do not perform, they are not renewed
Are freed from rules and regulations intended to ensure quality in traditional public school
Charter schools were instituted to reform tradition public schools, however, it will continue to be an argumentative topic.  Even though most charter schools have waiting list and it seems as if they are better than the traditional public school, as of March 2009, 12.5%, over 5000 US charter schools have closed due to problems in one or more of the following areas: academic, financial and managerial.  Still as of September 2012, there are over 100 charter schools serving approximately 25,000 students in New Jersey.  Each charter school's rate of success is unique.  Therefore, before choosing a charter, it important to learn about the particular school of interest.

Sunday, October 28, 2012

The Debate Over School Choice & Vouchers

Rachel Ricci    
10/28/12
Fundamentals of Curriculum
The Debate Over School Choice & Vouchers
            Place of residency has long been the determining factor of the public school education a child would receive unless a family chose to pay and send their child to a private school.  Since tax money funds public education, parents who send their children to private schools pay for both public and private education.  This has created a contentious debate in education.  Should you be able to take your tax money and spend it where you want to spend it whether it be in a public, parochial, in district, private or charter school?  The Interdistrict Public School Choice Program Act of 2010 18A:36B now allows families the opportunity to choose the school their child will attend outside of their geographic location with certain conditions applying.  An overview of school choice and vouchers will be discussed, as well as, the support and criticisms that go along with this change in educational choice.
            School choice gives parents the opportunity to choose the school their child will attend.  School choice does not give preference to any one form of school.  It is used when a student attends a school outside of their geographic default.  School choice allows for public funds to go to privately running schools.  A student therefore could attend a public, private, parochial or charter school or receive a voucher or tax credit for expenses related to schooling.  Private education is not then expensed out of the parent’s pocket, but paid for through the use of vouchers that are funded publicly. 
            In 2010 a new law was passed called the Interdistrict Public School Choice Program.  This law enables parents of children of school age to go to a school outside their district of residency if the selected school is participating in the choice program.  New Jersey currently has one hundred and seven school districts approved as choice districts.  According to the NJ Department of Education website http://www.state.nj.us/education/choice/, “The school choice program is an outstanding example of the department’s commitment to facilitate educational opportunities for the benefit of the children who are our ultimate clients.”  Participation in the program is optional and the decision to participate is made by the local board of education.  An application by a district to become a choice district must be submitted to the Commissioner of Education for certain criteria including;  the fiscal impact on the district, the quality and variety of academic programs offered within the district, the potential effectiveness of the student application process and the admissions criteria utilized, the impact on student population diversity in the district and the degree to which the program will promote or reduce educational quality in the choice district and sending districts.  The Commissioner will then either approve or deny the application. 
Any NJ resident student is eligible to take advantage of this program, regardless of race, gender, ethnicity, economic status, academic potential, athletic ability and or handicap.  The parent must submit an application to the sending school district with their interest in a choice school.  The number of openings is set by school choice at each grade level and if there are more students requesting admission to a school than there are openings, the school will admit students based on a lottery.  Transportation, up to twenty miles and costing no more than eight hundred and eighty four dollars, will be provided to a student going to a choice school.  Any transportation outside of the twenty miles of allowed money amount will need to be provided for by the parent.  If the parent chooses to transport their child, he or she will receive eight hundred and eighty four dollars in aid.  An annual report to the State Board of Education, the Legislature and the Joint Committee will be made by the Commissioner.  That report must include the effectiveness of the interdistrict public school choice program.  That report will be made available on the Department of Education’s website.
A school voucher is a certificate issued by the government, which parents can apply toward tuition at a private school or for reimbursement of home schooling.  Parents accept the vouchers in lieu of sending their child to the public school to which their child is assigned.  A parent may also choose to use an education tax credit to apply toward educational costs of a private school.  School choice and the use of vouchers to fund private education has become the new buzz in education and the Interdistrict Public School Choice Program has enacted this into current law.  There has been public support and opposition for this new law.  Supporters see opportunity for choice in education whereas critics see a weakening of the public school system.  Both sides of the argument will be reviewed.
Vouchers and school choice give more control to the parents in educational decision making.  Parents want what is best for their children and are paying for public education, and should therefore have influence in educational decision making.   Supporters of school choice and vouchers feel that public schools could use some competition in order to raise their efficiency.  Public schools will have to compete with private schools for student enrollment by improving test scores and overall wellness.  Supporters feel good schools will prosper whereas poor performing schools will be forced to improve or shut down.    School choice allows low income children in poor performing schools the opportunity to attend private schools.
The use of vouchers and school choice would take away funding to the public schools.  Opponents of school choice argue the public school system would be weakened by diverting resources to non public schools.  In most cases, vouchers would only cover the cost of a portion of private school tuition.  Would low income families then be able to afford the remainder of the private school tuition?  If not, then private schools would still be out of reach for low income families.  Opponents argue that parents may be choosing schools for the wrong reasons.  Parents may choose a school on racial composition.  School choice, therefore, could lead to segregation.
Valid arguments have been presented on both sides of school choice and vouchers.  Whether you are a supporter or not, charter schools are popping up in New Jersey and parents have been choosing to send their children outside of their defaulted public school.  My advice would be to do the research on the different schools available for your child.  I would look up school report cards on the State of New Jersey’s Department of Education’s website www.state.nj.us/education for further information on schools in your community.  Also, according to the Interdistrict Public School Choice Program, a choice district shall establish and maintain a parent information center. Parents may go to this center to collect information about participating programs, school information and the application process.  Below is a list of websites containing information on school choice, the laws pertaining to school choice, and NJ schools.

Internet References for Additional Information
1.      State of New Jersey’s Department of Education’s website: www.state.nj.us/education
2.      School Choice Overview: http://www.state.nj.us/education/choice/
3.      Interdistrict Public School Choice Program Act of 2010 law information: http://www.state.nj.us/education/choice/law.htm
6.      Approved Choice Districts in NJ: http://www.state.nj.us/education/choice/districts/




                                                                                     

Saturday, October 20, 2012

Classroom Instruction that Works


            In 2001, a book called, “Classroom Instruction that Works” by Robert Marzano, Debra Pickering, and Jane Pollock was published.  In 2012, a second edition of the book written by Ceri B. Dean, Elizabeth Ross Hubbell, Howard Pitler, and BJ Stone was published.  The second edition builds upon the work done in the fist book.  It incorporates findings from a study that clarifies the concepts related to each of the nine categories identified in the first edition and it uses an analysis of the literature published since the first edition to provide an updated estimate of each strategy’s effect on student achievement (Classroom Instruction that Works 2nd edition p. xiii).  The nine categories include:
·      Setting Objectives and Providing Feedback
·      Reinforcing Effort and Providing Recognition
·      Cooperative Learning
·      Cues, Questions, and Advance Organizers
·      Nonlinguistic Representations
·      Summarizing and Note Taking
·      Assigning Homework and Providing Practice
·      Identifying Similarities and Differences
·      Generating and Testing Hypothesis
The book is organized into three parts; in which each of the nine categories are divided into chapters with a final chapter devoted to Instructional Planning Using the Nine Categories.  Each chapter provides descriptions, examples, and strategies to help teachers use these practices in their own classrooms.
            In the chapter devoted to setting objectives and providing feedback it explains that the two concepts work hand in hand.  “Teachers need to identify success criteria for learning objectives so students know when they have achieved those objectives.  Similarly, feedback should be provided for tasks that are related to the learning objectives; this way students understand the purpose of the work they are asked to do, build a coherent understanding of a content domain, and develop high levels of skill in a specific domain (p. 3).”  The four recommendations given for setting objectives in the classroom are: 1.) Set learning objectives that are specific but not restrictive, 2.)  Communicate the learning objectives to students and parents, 3.)  Connect the learning objectives to previous and future learning 4.) Engage students in personal learning objectives. They also have four recommendations regarding feedback.  They are:  1.)  Provide feedback that addresses what is correct and elaborates on what students need to do next, 2.) Provide feedback appropriately in time to meet the students’ needs 3.) Provide feedback that is criterion referenced 4.) Engage students in the feedback process.   Throughout the chapter they give sample situations in which these processes are used and also examples of appropriate learning objectives and feedback. 
            Reinforcing Effort and Providing Recognition explains the importance of giving students recognition for their accomplishments and showing them the relationship between effort and achievement.  The three recommendations made for reinforcing effort are: 1.)  Teach students about the relationship between effort and achievement.  2.) Provide students with explicit guidance about exactly what it means to expend effort.  3.) Ask students to keep track of their effort and achievement.  With regards to the third recommendation, a sample of an effort rubric for test preparation is provided to show students the correlation between their effort and performance on tests.  There are also three recommendations that are made for providing recognition.  They are:  1) Promote a mastery-goal orientation.  2.) Provide praise that is specific and aligned with expected performance and behaviors.  3.) Use concrete symbols of recognition.  It also goes on to explain that too much praise could be negative, so it should be used intentionally, yet sparingly. 
            Cooperative Learning is another area of focus in the book.  According to Drs. David Johnson and Roger Johnson (1999) there are five elements to define cooperative learning:  positive interdependence, face-to-face promotive interaction, individual and group accountability, interpersonal and small-group skills and group processing (p.35-36).  They believe that the most essential are positive interdependence and individual accountability.  The three recommendations for using cooperative learning include:  1.) Include elements of both positive interdependence and individual accountability.  2.) Keep group sizes small.  3.) Use cooperative learning consistently and systematically.  They believe that to be effective cooperative learning should be used once a week and they caution not to over use it. 
            Cues, Questions, and Advanced Organizers is an important section in the fact that it shows teachers the specific ways to ask questions to ensure student learning.   Research has shown that 80 percent of teacher interactions with students involve cueing and questioning (p.50).  This section offers suggestions of some specific practices to make the most effective use of cues, questions, and advance organizers.  The suggestions include 1.) Focus on what is important, 2.) Use explicit clues, 3.) Ask inferential questions, 4.) Ask analytic questions.  With regards to advanced organizers, they suggest: 1.) Use expository advance organizers, 2.) Use narrative advanced organizers, 3.) Use skimming as an advance organizer, 4.) Use graphic advance organizers.  Some examples of the advance organizers are demonstrations, video clips, drawings, graphics, and skimming.  
            Nonlinguistic representations try to encourage students to create, store, and manipulate information either mentally of with concrete tools or displays (p. 64). Examples include:  creating graphic organizers, making physical models/manipulatives, generating mental pictures, creating pictures, illusions, or pictographs, and engaging in kinesthetic activity.  It is explained that the elaboration of knowledge gained by using nonlinguistic representations help students understand knowledge at a deeper level.
            The strategies of summarizing and note taking facilitate learning by providing opportunities for students to capture, organize, and reflect on important facts, concepts, ideas, and processes (p. 78).   Students’ comprehension can be increased through summarizing because they need to sort, select, and combine information.  Similarly, when note taking students must identify important information.  Some suggestions for summarizing include: 1.)  Teach students the rule-based summarizing strategy, 2.) Use summary frames, 3.) Engage students in reciprocal teaching.  The suggestions given for note taking are: 1.) Give students teacher-prepared notes, 2.)   Teach students a variety of note-taking formats, and 3.) Provide opportunities for students to revise their notes and use them for review. 
            Assigning homework and providing practice is an important category because assigning homework and proving practice allows students to learn or review content and skills on their own.  There are mixed results on the research in how effective homework is.  As a result, teachers should carefully design the assignments with the following things in mind 1.) Develop and communicate a district or school homework policy, 2.)  Design homework assignments that support academic learning and communicate their purpose, 3.) Provide feedback on assigned homework.  When providing practice, teachers should: 1.)  Clearly identify and communicate the purpose of practice activities, 2.)  Design practice sessions that are short, focused and distributed over time, 3.) Provide feedback on practice sessions. 
            Another area of focus is identifying similarities and differences, which is important because it helps us make senses of the world.  Identifying similarities and differences is the process of comparing information, sorting concepts into categories, and making connections to existing knowledge.  The recommendations made for helping students to identify similarities and differences are to: 1.) Teach students a variety of ways to identify similarities and differences 2.)  Guide students as they engage in the process of identifying similarities and differences, 3.)  Provide supporting cues to help students identify similarities and differences.  Examples include Venn diagrams, comparison matrixes, and creating metaphors. 
            The final area covered in the book is generating and testing hypotheses.  This includes the mental processes involved in asking questions and seeking answers.  It does not only take place in a science classroom.  It is a part of other content areas, however it may be referred to as other names such as predicting, inferring, deducing, or theorizing (p. 135).  In order to engage students in this process in all content areas the following recommendations are made: 1.) Engage students in a variety of structured tasks for generating and testing hypotheses, 2.) Ask students to explain their hypothesis and their conclusions.  These are important so that students can apply the information that they learn, not just recall facts. 
            Overall, “Classroom Instruction that Works” provides great tips and ideas for teachers to implement their research based strategies.  Each topic is broken down into its own chapter and provides not only tips and examples, but also explains why these are “best practices” according to the research.  My school has implemented the McRel Powerwalk through and has purchased copies of this book for all teachers and they are proving PLC’s in order to help teachers implement these strategies.

           

Thursday, October 4, 2012

Wednesday, October 3, 2012

TEACHNJ Act - New Tenure Reform Law


            There are so many issues facing educators in today’s world. An issue not new to education but one that has received a great deal of attention lately is the issue of tenure reform. Over the past decade, teacher tenure has come under fire as one of the major problems facing education today. Before one can speak to the issues of tenure reform, we must identify the concept of tenure. What is tenure? Academic tenure refers to a policy that provides job security for teachers who have successfully completed a probationary period and may not be disciplined or fired without cause or due process. Its purpose was to provide protection for good teachers from being fired for issues related to their personal beliefs or personality conflicts with educational leaders. It provided teachers with the opportunity and freedom to pursue research and teach their students accordingly without political fall-out.  Critics indicate that tenure makes it virtually impossible to remove ineffective teachers as it can involve years of review at great expense to the school districts.
            On August 6, 2012, Governor Chris Christie signed the Teacher Effectiveness and Accountability for the Children of New Jersey (TEACHNJ) Act, a bold first step in education reform in New Jersey that links the tenure process and teacher performance. This bipartisan effort that takes effect in the 2012 – 2013 school year marks the first extensive reform of New Jersey’s tenure law in over 100 years, and is viewed as a critical step necessary to ensure the presence of highly effective teachers in every classroom.  The intent of this legislation is to “transform the existing tenure system to provide powerful tools to identify effective and ineffective teachers, strengthen the supports available to help all teachers to improve their craft, and for the first time, tie the acquisition, maintenance, and loss of tenure to a teacher’s effectiveness in the classroom” (“Governor Chris Christie”, 2012). Many are hopeful that this new law will bring about the necessary changes to improve student success. With that said, there is still a great deal of uncertainty as to how this law will be effectively implemented.
For the first time in New Jersey’s history, a connection is being made between the acquisition of tenure with teacher effectiveness rather than to the years of service in the profession.  Teacher tenure must be earned on the basis of educator performance that will now be measured by a new, and what many are calling a modernized evaluation system, a system that elicits more collaborative, constructive feedback on teacher practices. Educational leaders, using this feedback, can then provide ongoing professional development that supports student achievement.
These new evaluation systems are currently being piloted in a number of school districts and must be implemented during the 2013 – 2014 school year. “Evaluations must be based on an individual’s job description, professional standards, the use of multiple measures of student progress and multiple data sources. Only approved (by the district BOE and the NJDOE) evaluation tool’s rubrics can be used as the primary reference for evaluations” (Parent, 2012). The law also contains a provision “requiring that the rubric be partially based on multiple objective measures of student learning that use student growth from one year’s measure to the next” (Parent, 2012). The law, however does not specifically state which evaluation tool to use. That choice is left to the discretion of the school districts. Which then begs the question, will there be consistency state wide?  Student test scores should not be the principal factor in teacher evaluations. In grades and subject areas where standardized tests are not state-mandated, it is up to the district to determine the method of measuring student growth. Districts must also provide guidelines for proper training to ensure competence in the use of the evaluation tool.  
  Under the new law, tenure will be granted after four years and only awarded after receiving a rating of “effective” or “highly effective” in at least two of the next three years. It should be noted that those in the process of earning tenure prior to the signing of the new law will still earn tenure in three years. The first year will now require those new to the teaching profession to be mentored by skilled colleagues and educational leaders. This is to ensure they have the necessary skills and essential supports needed to be effective. “If a teacher receives a rating of “ineffective” or “partially ineffective” on an annual summative evaluation, a corrective action plan must be developed by the administrator and the plan must include how the school district will assist and provide help” (Parent, 2012). If the teacher experiences this type of rating on a second consecutive evaluation, the teacher will be brought up on tenure charges and removed based on poor performance. It should be noted that in such cases, the superintendent may choose to give a teacher a third year to demonstrate improvement. During that third year, the teacher would have to receive a rating of “effective” or “highly effective” to avoid facing tenure charges. Anyone brought up on tenure charges would then have the right to refute these charges at a hearing before a neutral third party.
Under the new law, all tenure charges will be heard by an arbitrator. In order to effectively expedite this process, the Commissioner of Education is now required to have a 25 member panel of nationally certified arbitrators to hear cases involving tenure. “Of the 25 arbitrators, 8 arbitrators shall be designated by the New Jersey Education Association, 3 arbitrators shall be designated by the American Federation of Teachers, 9 arbitrators shall be designated by the New Jersey Boards Association, and 5 arbitrators shall be designated by the New Jersey Principals and Supervisors Association” (Parent, 2012). All decisions made during arbitration are final and binding and may not be appealed to the Commissioner of Education. The time frame will be limited to a period of 105 days from the time charges are received and costs to be paid by the state are capped at $1250 per day and $7,500 per case.
Teacher tenure is not transferrable from one district to another. “Any employee beginning employment in a new district after the effective date of the new law must earn tenure under its requirements, even if that employee was previously tenured in another district under the requirements of the old law” (NJEA, 2012). The rights to maintain due process and seniority have been maintained in the new law.
Assemblyman Patrick J. Diegnan Jr. stated, “This is meaningful tenure reform that does what’s best for our children while balancing the protection of due process for our principals and teachers. This is real change that will ensure new teachers are properly trained and evaluated and that tenure charges are handled in a timely and professional manner. Our focus is where it should be – making sure that our students have the best teachers in the classroom” (“Governor Chris Christie”, 2012).
 “Committed, education stakeholders must work together to build innovative reforms that accelerate 21st century transformations that benefit learning and education’s key focus: the integrity of equity, value, and relevance in educational opportunities and meaningful experiences for all learners” (Petrosino, 2012).

References
Governor chris christie signs revolutionary bipartisan tenure reform into law.          (2012,August 06). Retrieved from http://www.state.nj.us/governor/news/news/552012/approved/20120806c.htm
NJEA. (2012, September). The new tenure law. Retrieved from http://www.njea.org/news-and-publications/njea-review/september-2012/the-new-tenure-law
Parent, M. (2012, July 27). The push & the pull: breaking down the teachnj act. Retrieved from http://mikeparent.blogspot.com/2012/07/breaking-down-teachnj-act.html
Petrosino, A. (2012, June 27). Dr. petrosino. Retrieved from     
Teachnjact.(n.d.). Retrieved from http://www.njleg.state.nj.us/2012/Bills/AL12/26_HTM